The assertion that ending a marital union is much less difficult than fostering a sturdy, fulfilling romantic relationship displays a standard sentiment relating to the complexities of human connection and authorized processes. Dissolving a wedding typically includes navigating established authorized frameworks, with outlined procedures for asset division and, if relevant, youngster custody. Conversely, cultivating and sustaining a loving bond requires constant effort, compromise, and efficient communication, components typically absent in failing relationships.
The perceived ease of marital dissolution in comparison with the trouble required for sustained love highlights societal shifts and evolving expectations inside relationships. Traditionally, divorce carried important social stigma and authorized hurdles, making it a much less accessible possibility. The relative accessibility of divorce proceedings in up to date society, coupled with heightened expectations of non-public success inside relationships, could contribute to the point of view that severing ties is easier than resolving underlying points. This attitude underscores the continuing debate concerning the nature of dedication and the challenges inherent in long-term partnerships.
Given the contrasting dynamics of authorized separation and relational upkeep, it turns into essential to discover the underlying elements contributing to marital discord, the assets out there for relationship strengthening, and the potential penalties of prioritizing particular person wants over collective well-being inside a partnership. Subsequent evaluation will delve into particular areas, together with communication breakdown, monetary stressors, and the impression of societal pressures on marital stability.
1. Authorized Accessibility
The rising accessibility of divorce contributes on to the notion that dissolving a wedding is much less arduous than sustaining a loving relationship. Authorized accessibility refers back to the simplification of divorce procedures, typically involving lowered ready durations, streamlined paperwork, and the supply of no-fault divorce choices. This implies people can terminate their marital union while not having to show wrongdoing on the a part of their partner. As an example, jurisdictions providing no-fault divorce legal guidelines enable {couples} to separate based mostly solely on irreconcilable variations, eradicating the burden of creating grounds akin to adultery or abandonment. This authorized framework reduces the obstacles to exit, making divorce a extra available answer to marital difficulties. The impact is that {couples} going through challenges could view separation as a less complicated path than participating within the advanced work required for reconciliation and relationship restore.
The impression of authorized accessibility is additional amplified by the rising affordability of divorce. The supply of professional se (self-representation) choices, on-line divorce providers, and authorized assist organizations reduces the monetary burden related to dissolving a wedding. This enables people who might need beforehand been constrained by monetary limitations to pursue separation, solidifying the view that divorce is an simply attainable possibility. Contemplate, for instance, the rise of on-line divorce platforms that provide low-cost doc preparation providers, enabling {couples} to navigate the authorized course of with minimal expense. This, coupled with simplified court docket procedures, makes divorce extra accessible to a wider vary of people, no matter their socioeconomic standing.
In conclusion, authorized accessibility lowers the edge for exiting a wedding, thereby contributing to the sentiment that divorce is simple in comparison with the demanding work of cultivating and sustaining love. Whereas the simplification of divorce proceedings goals to offer a good and environment friendly mechanism for resolving marital disputes, it concurrently reinforces the notion that ending a relationship is a viable different to navigating the inherent challenges of long-term dedication. This underscores the necessity for assets and assist techniques that encourage {couples} to deal with their points constructively earlier than resorting to divorce as a seemingly simpler answer.
2. Emotional Funding
The disparity between the perceived ease of divorce and the problem of sustaining love is profoundly linked to emotional funding. Forming and nurturing a long-lasting, loving relationship necessitates a considerable and sustained emotional funding from each companions. This funding encompasses vulnerability, empathy, time, power, and a willingness to prioritize the wants and well-being of the opposite. When this emotional funding wanes or turns into unbalanced, the connection weakens, rising the chance that divorce will seem as a less complicated different to the arduous process of rebuilding emotional connection. Contemplate, for example, a pair scuffling with demanding careers and elevating youngsters. In the event that they fail to dedicate adequate emotional power to their relationship, emotions of disconnection and resentment could come up, eroding the muse of their marriage. This lack of funding can lead to some extent the place the authorized means of divorce appears much less daunting than confronting and resolving the underlying emotional points.
Moreover, the absence of emotional funding typically manifests as a reluctance to interact in open and trustworthy communication. A vital part of emotional funding is the willingness to share vulnerabilities and tackle conflicts constructively. When people are unwilling or unable to take a position emotionally in these processes, communication deteriorates, making a cycle of confusion and resentment. For example, a pair could keep away from discussing their monetary considerations or insecurities for concern of battle, resulting in a build-up of pressure and a rising emotional distance. This lack of emotional transparency hinders their capacity to resolve points collaboratively and strengthens the notion that divorce presents a faster escape from these unresolved emotional burdens. The sensible significance of recognizing the significance of emotional funding lies in its preventative function. By consciously prioritizing emotional connection and communication, {couples} can mitigate the erosion of their relationship and scale back the chance of viewing divorce as the one viable possibility.
In conclusion, the assertion that divorce is less complicated than love is instantly associated to the extent of emotional funding each companions are prepared to make. An absence of emotional dedication creates an setting the place the authorized means of divorce appears much less difficult than the continuing effort required to maintain a loving and fulfilling partnership. Overcoming this requires a aware and sustained effort to prioritize emotional connection, foster open communication, and tackle conflicts constructively. With out this funding, the notion that divorce presents a neater path turns into more and more compelling, highlighting the elemental significance of emotional dedication in sustaining a long-lasting and loving relationship.
3. Communication Breakdown
Communication breakdown stands as a essential catalyst within the dynamic the place marital dissolution seems easier than the sustained effort required for a loving partnership. The absence of efficient communication channels precipitates misunderstandings, escalates conflicts, and fosters emotional distance, in the end eroding the muse of the connection. This erosion creates a state of affairs the place the perceived burden of resolving deep-seated communicative points outweighs the trouble concerned in navigating the authorized means of divorce. Contemplate a state of affairs the place companions constantly fail to articulate their wants, considerations, and expectations. Over time, this lack of open dialogue fosters resentment and mistrust, resulting in a communication deadlock that renders collaborative problem-solving unimaginable. The rising problem of navigating on a regular basis interactions additional solidifies the concept divorce supplies a neater, albeit drastic, answer.
The hyperlink between communication breakdown and the notion of simpler divorce can also be amplified by the reluctance to hunt skilled assist or interact in constructive battle decision strategies. Many {couples} going through communication challenges keep away from remedy or counseling, both resulting from stigma, monetary constraints, or a perception that their issues are insurmountable. This avoidance perpetuates the cycle of miscommunication and prevents the event of efficient methods for addressing conflicts constructively. For example, a pair could repeatedly interact in arguments with out resolving the underlying points, resulting in a way of hopelessness and a perception that divorce is the one path ahead. Moreover, the widespread availability of digital communication platforms, whereas providing handy technique of interplay, can inadvertently exacerbate communication breakdown. Misinterpretations of text-based messages, coupled with the absence of nonverbal cues, can gasoline misunderstandings and intensify current conflicts. The sensible consequence is an elevated sense of isolation and frustration, reinforcing the notion that severing ties is preferable to navigating the complexities of repairing broken communication patterns.
In conclusion, communication breakdown is a major contributor to the notion that marital dissolution is a less complicated answer than fostering a loving relationship. The shortcoming to speak successfully, coupled with the avoidance {of professional} help and the challenges posed by digital communication, creates an setting the place divorce seems to be the much less demanding possibility. Addressing this requires a proactive dedication to bettering communication expertise, searching for skilled steering when obligatory, and fostering a tradition of open and trustworthy dialogue inside the relationship. With out these interventions, the cycle of miscommunication continues, reinforcing the notion that divorce supplies a neater escape from the complexities of sustaining a satisfying partnership.
4. Compromise Required
The need of compromise in sustaining a loving relationship instantly impacts the notion that divorce is a neater different. The willingness and skill to compromise replicate a basic dedication to the partnership, influencing the diploma to which {couples} understand the challenges of affection as surmountable versus insurmountable.
-
Ego Give up
Compromise typically necessitates the partial or non permanent relinquishing of 1’s personal needs or preferences for the advantage of the connection. This “ego give up” could be difficult, because it requires people to prioritize the wants of the partnership over their very own fast gratification. For instance, one associate could must forgo a profession alternative in a distinct metropolis to accommodate the opposite associate’s job or household obligations. This fixed negotiation and adjustment could be emotionally taxing, making the perceived simplicity of divorce a tempting different to the continuing calls for of compromise. Failure to successfully handle ego-related wants inside the relationship considerably will increase the chance of resentment and in the end, marital dissolution.
-
Useful resource Allocation
Compromise extends to the allocation of assets, together with time, cash, and emotional power. Disagreements over how you can spend monetary assets or how you can divide family tasks can turn into important sources of battle. A pair would possibly disagree on whether or not to put money into a house renovation or prioritize saving for retirement. These seemingly small disagreements, if left unresolved, can escalate and create a way of inequity inside the relationship. The fixed negotiation required for truthful useful resource allocation underscores the trouble concerned in sustaining a partnership, contrasting sharply with the perceived ease of dividing property throughout a divorce.
-
Worth Alignment
Efficient compromise hinges on the alignment of core values and beliefs. When companions maintain essentially totally different views on essential points akin to faith, politics, or child-rearing, reaching mutually acceptable options turns into considerably tougher. As an example, a pair with differing views on the significance of schooling could wrestle to agree on the suitable education for his or her youngsters. These basic disagreements, if left unaddressed, can erode the muse of the connection and make the prospect of divorce appear much less daunting than the continuing wrestle to reconcile divergent values.
-
Flexibility and Adaptability
Compromise requires each companions to be versatile and adaptable to altering circumstances. Life occasions akin to job loss, sickness, or the beginning of a kid can place important pressure on a relationship, demanding changes to roles, tasks, and expectations. The power to navigate these transitions with grace and a willingness to compromise is essential for sustaining stability. A associate who’s unwilling to adapt to altering circumstances could create resentment and undermine the partnership’s capacity to climate troublesome instances. The rigidity and unwillingness to compromise within the face of life’s inevitable challenges contribute to the sentiment that dissolving the wedding presents a less complicated pathway than enduring the fixed want for adjustment.
The multifaceted nature of compromise highlights its important function in sustaining a loving relationship. The continued negotiation, adaptation, and willingness to give up particular person needs for the advantage of the partnership signify a major funding of time and emotional power. The failure to successfully compromise in these key areas contributes on to the notion that divorce is a neater different, underscoring the significance of creating sturdy communication and battle decision expertise to navigate the inherent challenges of long-term dedication.
5. Societal Expectations
Societal expectations exert a major affect on the notion that divorce is less complicated than sustaining a loving relationship. These expectations, encompassing idealized visions of marriage, particular person success, and gender roles, create pressures that may undermine marital stability and contribute to a way that divorce presents a less complicated answer to advanced relational challenges.
-
Idealized Marriage Fable
Societal expectations typically promote an unrealistic portrayal of marriage as a state of perpetual bliss and easy concord. Media depictions, social media traits, and cultural narratives steadily emphasize the romantic elements of relationships whereas downplaying the inevitable challenges and compromises required for sustained dedication. When {couples} encounter the inevitable difficulties of marriage, they might really feel disillusioned and conclude that their relationship is failing to satisfy societal requirements. This disillusionment contributes to the idea that divorce is a neater answer than addressing the underlying points and dealing in direction of a extra lifelike and sustainable partnership. The parable of the “good” marriage units an unattainable normal, rising the chance that {couples} will view divorce as a available escape from perceived failure.
-
Emphasis on Particular person Achievement
Up to date society locations a robust emphasis on particular person success and private happiness, typically prioritizing particular person wants over collective well-being. This give attention to self-actualization can create pressure inside marriages, notably when one associate perceives their private development or happiness as being hindered by the connection. The expectation that marriage ought to improve particular person happiness, quite than requiring sacrifice and compromise, can result in a way that divorce is a less complicated path in direction of reaching private objectives and fulfilling particular person aspirations. The prioritizing of non-public success over shared dedication diminishes the perceived worth of the marital bond, making divorce a extra palatable possibility when private wants and relationship calls for battle.
-
Evolving Gender Roles
Shifting gender roles and expectations inside marriage contribute to the complexity of sustaining loving relationships. Conventional gender roles, the place males had been primarily accountable for monetary assist and girls for home duties, have developed considerably, resulting in extra egalitarian preparations in lots of relationships. Nonetheless, these evolving roles may create battle and uncertainty as {couples} navigate the division of labor, childcare tasks, and profession aspirations. When companions wrestle to adapt to altering expectations or adhere to outdated gender stereotypes, the ensuing pressure can undermine marital stability and contribute to the notion that divorce is a less complicated answer than renegotiating roles and tasks. The evolving panorama of gender dynamics inside marriage necessitates ongoing communication and adaptation, making divorce a extra accessible different for {couples} unwilling or unable to navigate these advanced shifts.
-
Social Stigma Discount
The declining social stigma related to divorce has considerably contributed to its elevated accessibility and acceptance. Traditionally, divorce carried important social and non secular condemnation, discouraging people from dissolving their marriages. Nonetheless, up to date society has largely deserted these stigmas, making divorce a extra socially acceptable possibility for {couples} going through marital difficulties. This discount in social stress empowers people to prioritize their very own well-being and happiness, even when it means ending their marriage. The elevated social acceptance of divorce diminishes the obstacles to exit, reinforcing the notion that dissolving a wedding is a less complicated answer than enduring an unfulfilling or sad relationship.
In conclusion, societal expectations play a vital function in shaping the notion that divorce is less complicated than sustaining a loving relationship. The idealized portrayal of marriage, the emphasis on particular person success, the evolving nature of gender roles, and the lowered social stigma surrounding divorce all contribute to a cultural context that may undermine marital stability and make divorce a seemingly easier answer. Addressing these influences requires a essential examination of societal expectations and a dedication to fostering extra lifelike and sustainable fashions of marriage and relationships.
6. Private Progress
The pursuit of non-public development considerably influences the notion that dissolving a wedding is much less demanding than cultivating a loving, enduring relationship. Particular person improvement and self-discovery are sometimes emphasised in up to date society, generally on the expense of marital dedication. The prioritization of non-public development, notably when it conflicts with the wants of the partnership, can create a state of affairs the place divorce seems to supply a less complicated pathway to self-actualization. For instance, one associate could search private success by way of profession development or instructional pursuits, resulting in a lowered funding within the relationship. This imbalance of effort and dedication could result in a way of detachment and the idea that divorce supplies the required area for particular person development. The emphasis on self-improvement, whereas typically constructive, can inadvertently contribute to the view that ending a wedding is a neater path than navigating the complexities of mutual improvement inside the relationship.
The connection between private development and the relative ease of divorce is additional difficult by differing charges of particular person improvement inside a wedding. Companions could evolve at totally different paces, resulting in a divergence in pursuits, values, and objectives. If one associate experiences important private development whereas the opposite stays stagnant, the ensuing disparity can create a chasm inside the relationship. As an illustration, one partner could develop new views and pursuits by way of publicity to totally different cultures or experiences, whereas the opposite partner stays entrenched in acquainted routines. This disparity can result in emotions of disconnection and a way that the connection not helps particular person development. The authorized means of divorce could then be perceived as a extra easy answer than the troublesome process of bridging the developmental hole. Efficient communication and mutual assist are essential to navigate these divergent paths of non-public development inside a wedding. An absence of open dialogue or a failure to acknowledge and assist one another’s particular person improvement can enhance the chance that divorce will seem as the simpler possibility.
In conclusion, the pursuit and attainment of non-public development exert a substantial affect on the dynamics underlying the sentiment that dissolving a wedding is much less difficult than sustaining a loving relationship. The prioritization of particular person improvement, coupled with differing charges of non-public development inside the marriage, can contribute to a way of disconnection and the idea that divorce presents a less complicated path to self-actualization. Understanding this connection highlights the significance of fostering mutual assist, efficient communication, and a shared dedication to non-public and relational development inside the marital partnership. With out these components, the pursuit of particular person development can inadvertently undermine the muse of the wedding, resulting in a notion that divorce supplies a neater answer than the demanding work of navigating mutual improvement.
7. Forgiveness Wanted
The idea of “Forgiveness Wanted” is intrinsically linked to the notion that “divorce is simple however love is difficult.” Inside the context of marital relationships, forgiveness represents the aware and deliberate act of releasing resentment, anger, and the will for retribution in direction of a associate who has precipitated hurt or dedicated a transgression. The power, or lack thereof, to increase forgiveness instantly influences the long-term viability of the connection. Transgressions, whether or not perceived or actual, accumulate over time. With out constant forgiveness, these unresolved points erode the muse of belief and intimacy, fostering an setting of resentment and animosity. This amassed negativity typically leads companions to view divorce as a much less difficult different than confronting and resolving the underlying points. For example, infidelity, monetary mismanagement, or constant emotional neglect can create deep wounds inside a relationship. If the injured associate is unable or unwilling to forgive the transgressor, the connection is more likely to deteriorate, in the end resulting in dissolution. The sensible significance of understanding the function of forgiveness lies in recognizing its preventative energy; cultivating a tradition of forgiveness inside a wedding is an energetic step in direction of mitigating the buildup of unresolved points and strengthening the bond between companions.
The issue in extending forgiveness typically stems from the perceived severity of the transgression and the extent of the emotional injury inflicted. Forgiveness isn’t synonymous with condoning or excusing dangerous conduct. Reasonably, it signifies a willingness to relinquish the will for revenge and to maneuver ahead constructively. Nonetheless, this course of requires important emotional labor, vulnerability, and a real dedication to reconciliation from each companions. When one associate is unwilling to acknowledge their wrongdoing or actively resist making amends, the injured get together could discover forgiveness unattainable. This deadlock additional fuels resentment and reinforces the view that divorce presents a less complicated escape from the unresolved battle. The effectiveness of forgiveness additionally relies on the presence of real regret and a demonstrated change in conduct from the transgressor. With out these components, forgiveness can turn into a superficial act, failing to deal with the underlying points and in the end undermining the connection. The sensible utility of this understanding lies in recognizing the significance of mutual accountability and a willingness to interact in honest reconciliation efforts. {Couples} should actively work to deal with the foundation causes of battle and set up a basis of belief and respect earlier than forgiveness can turn into a significant and transformative course of.
In conclusion, “Forgiveness Wanted” represents a essential component within the dynamic the place marital dissolution seems easier than sustaining a loving partnership. The buildup of unresolved points, the problem in extending real forgiveness, and the absence of regret or behavioral change all contribute to the notion that divorce supplies a much less difficult answer. Whereas the authorized means of divorce could provide a swift decision to a troubled marriage, it fails to deal with the underlying emotional wounds and relational patterns that contribute to its demise. Cultivating a tradition of forgiveness requires ongoing effort, mutual accountability, and a real dedication to reconciliation. With out these components, the cycle of resentment and animosity continues, perpetuating the sentiment that divorce supplies a neater escape from the demanding work of sustaining a loving and enduring relationship. The problem lies in recognizing the transformative energy of forgiveness and actively fostering its presence inside the marital bond, thereby mitigating the perceived simplicity of divorce.
Steadily Requested Questions
The next addresses widespread inquiries associated to the complexities of marital dissolution versus the challenges of sustaining enduring love, aiming to offer readability and knowledgeable views.
Query 1: Why is divorce typically perceived as simpler than sustaining a loving relationship?
The notion arises from the relative ease of navigating authorized procedures for divorce in comparison with the sustained effort required for emotional intimacy, communication, and compromise inside a wedding. Authorized frameworks present structured processes for dissolution, whereas love necessitates steady nurturing and adaptation.
Query 2: How does the accessibility of no-fault divorce impression marital stability?
No-fault divorce, permitting dissolution with out proving fault, reduces authorized obstacles to exit. Whereas providing a compassionate answer for irreconcilable variations, it could contribute to a notion that ending a wedding is a available different to addressing relational challenges.
Query 3: What function does emotional funding play within the longevity of a wedding?
Sustained emotional funding, encompassing vulnerability, empathy, and energetic listening, varieties the bedrock of a robust marital basis. A decline in emotional funding typically results in disconnection and will increase the chance that divorce will seem as a less complicated answer than rebuilding emotional intimacy.
Query 4: How does communication breakdown contribute to marital dissolution?
Communication breakdown erodes belief, fosters misunderstandings, and prevents efficient battle decision. When {couples} are unable to speak constructively, the perceived effort of resolving deep-seated communicative points typically outweighs the perceived effort of pursuing divorce.
Query 5: Why is compromise important for sustaining a loving relationship?
Compromise includes the willingness to relinquish particular person needs for the advantage of the partnership. An absence of compromise creates resentment and energy imbalances, in the end undermining the soundness of the connection and rising the attraction of divorce.
Query 6: How do societal expectations affect the notion of marriage and divorce?
Unrealistic societal expectations relating to marital bliss and particular person success can create stress on {couples}, resulting in disillusionment when confronted with the realities of long-term dedication. The declining social stigma of divorce additional reinforces the notion that dissolving a wedding is an appropriate answer to relational challenges.
In essence, the perceived ease of divorce relative to the problem of affection displays a fancy interaction of authorized accessibility, emotional funding, communication dynamics, and societal influences. Recognizing these elements is essential for fostering extra lifelike expectations and selling more healthy relationship patterns.
The following section will study methods for strengthening marital bonds and mitigating the danger of dissolution.
Methods for Cultivating Enduring Love
Given the noticed disparity between the perceived ease of divorce and the inherent challenges of sustained loving partnerships, the next outlines key methods to advertise marital stability and relational well-being.
Technique 1: Prioritize Constant Emotional Funding. Sustained emotional connection requires ongoing effort. Usually interact in actions that foster intimacy, akin to devoted date nights, shared hobbies, or just allocating time for significant conversations. The constant funding of emotional power strengthens the bond and reduces the chance of disconnection.
Technique 2: Improve Communication Abilities. Efficient communication is paramount. Apply energetic listening, searching for to grasp a associate’s perspective with out judgment. Clearly articulate wants and considerations utilizing “I” statements to keep away from blame. Contemplate skilled steering from a therapist or counselor to develop constructive communication patterns.
Technique 3: Embrace Compromise and Flexibility. Lengthy-term relationships necessitate a willingness to compromise. Prioritize mutual wants over particular person needs when potential. Be adaptable to altering circumstances and embrace flexibility in roles and tasks. Perceive that sustained concord requires ongoing negotiation.
Technique 4: Handle Expectations Realistically. Discard idealized notions of marriage. Acknowledge that every one relationships expertise challenges and durations of problem. Give attention to constructing a partnership based mostly on lifelike expectations, mutual respect, and a shared dedication to navigating life’s complexities.
Technique 5: Domesticate Forgiveness. Lengthen forgiveness for transgressions, each giant and small. Acknowledge that everybody makes errors. Attempt to relinquish resentment and embrace reconciliation. Forgiveness isn’t condoning dangerous conduct however quite releasing the will for retribution.
Technique 6: Foster Particular person Progress. Help one another’s private improvement. Encourage particular person pursuits and create area for private development. Acknowledge that supporting a associate’s particular person aspirations strengthens the connection as an entire.
Technique 7: Search Skilled Help When Wanted. Acknowledge the worth {of professional} steering. {Couples} remedy or counseling supplies a protected and structured setting to deal with relational challenges, enhance communication expertise, and develop methods for long-term stability.
Adopting these methods can considerably improve marital stability and foster a deeper, extra fulfilling connection. By prioritizing emotional funding, communication, compromise, and lifelike expectations, {couples} can mitigate the notion that divorce presents a neater path than the demanding, but rewarding, journey of sustained love.
The ultimate part presents concluding ideas on the enduring worth of dedication and the rewards of navigating relational complexities.
Concluding Observations
The assertion that divorce is simple however love is difficult serves as a stark reminder of the contrasting realities of authorized dissolution and relational upkeep. Examination reveals that authorized accessibility, declining emotional funding, communication breakdowns, inadequate compromise, unrealistic societal expectations, a divergence in private development trajectories, and a failure to increase forgiveness contribute to the perceived simplicity of marital separation. This attitude underscores a societal inclination towards available options for advanced interpersonal challenges. The obvious ease with which a wedding could be legally terminated contrasts sharply with the sustained effort, vulnerability, and mutual dedication required to domesticate a long-lasting, fulfilling partnership. Emphasis has been positioned on methods that strengthen marital bonds, recognizing that fostering emotional funding, enhancing communication, embracing compromise, managing expectations, cultivating forgiveness, supporting particular person development, and searching for skilled help are very important to navigate the intricacies of long-term dedication.
Finally, the true measure of societal well-being could relaxation not on the benefit of dissolving relationships, however on the collective dedication to nurturing them. Whereas authorized frameworks present a obligatory mechanism for resolving marital disputes, the enduring worth lies in cultivating the talents, fostering the understanding, and offering the assets essential to navigate the complexities of affection and dedication. A renewed give attention to relational well being, proactive communication, and the willingness to interact within the difficult but rewarding work of sustained partnership stays important for selling particular person and collective well-being, thereby diminishing the attraction of dissolution as a seemingly easier path.
