Maryland operates underneath the precept of equitable distribution in divorce proceedings, not a strict equal division of belongings. Because of this marital property is split pretty, although not essentially in a 50/50 break up. The courtroom considers varied components to make sure the result is simply, taking into consideration the contributions of every partner, each monetary and non-financial, in the course of the marriage. For example, if one partner considerably contributed to the opposite’s profession development, this could be factored into the asset division.
The adoption of equitable distribution goals to handle the complexities inherent in marital relationships and the differing roles spouses might play. This strategy acknowledges that equal contributions don’t at all times translate to equal monetary inputs. The historic context reveals a shift from earlier widespread legislation programs that usually favored the financially dominant partner. Equitable distribution serves to guard the pursuits of each events, notably those that might have sacrificed profession alternatives to help the household. Its profit lies in its adaptability to particular person circumstances, permitting for a extra nuanced and truthful decision.
Due to this fact, understanding the components thought-about by Maryland courts when dividing property is essential for people navigating divorce. These concerns embrace the contributions of every partner to the acquisition of marital property, the financial circumstances of every partner, the explanations for the divorce, and different related components that the courtroom deems obligatory to realize a simply end result. This framework determines how belongings like actual property, retirement accounts, and private property are allotted.
1. Equitable Distribution
Equitable distribution kinds the cornerstone of property division in Maryland divorces, straight addressing whether or not the state adheres to a easy 50/50 asset break up. The precept dictates a good, although not essentially equal, division of marital belongings, transferring past a purely mathematical strategy.
-
Marital vs. Non-Marital Property
Maryland legislation distinguishes between marital and non-marital property. Solely marital property, outlined as belongings acquired in the course of the marriage, is topic to equitable distribution. Non-marital property, akin to presents or inheritances obtained by one partner, stays separate. Correct classification of belongings is paramount because it straight impacts the pool of property obtainable for division, clarifying that “equal” division applies solely to the marital portion deemed divisible.
-
Components Thought-about in Division
The courtroom evaluates quite a few components to find out an equitable distribution. These embrace the contributions of every partner (monetary and non-financial), the financial circumstances of every partner, the size of the wedding, and the explanations for the divorce. A partner who sacrificed profession alternatives to help the household might obtain a bigger share to compensate for this contribution. Consideration of those nuanced circumstances strikes past a easy 50/50 break up, illustrating the complexity inherent in equitable distribution.
-
Courtroom Discretion and Deviation from Equality
Maryland courts possess appreciable discretion in figuring out an equitable end result. This permits judges to deviate from an equal (50/50) division when warranted by the precise details of the case. For instance, if one partner engaged in marital misconduct that dissipated marital belongings, the courtroom might award a disproportionately bigger share to the opposite partner. This discretionary energy reinforces the idea that equity, not strict equality, guides property division.
-
Alimony’s Affect on Property Division
The potential for alimony influences property distribution. If one partner is awarded alimony, this may occasionally impression the division of marital belongings. The courtroom might modify the property division to account for the continuing monetary help offered via alimony. Property division and alimony are interconnected concerns that contribute to an total equitable decision, additional emphasizing {that a} simple 50/50 break up shouldn’t be the operative precept.
These aspects illustrate that Maryland’s equitable distribution system is a multifaceted strategy that prioritizes equity based mostly on particular person circumstances. The absence of a strict 50/50 rule permits for consideration of quite a few components that have an effect on the monetary well-being of each events following divorce, solidifying the state’s dedication to equitable, slightly than merely equal, outcomes.
2. Not At all times Equal
The phrase “Not at all times equal” is intrinsically linked to understanding if Maryland adheres to a 50/50 divorce legislation. Whereas a simplified view would possibly counsel an equal division of belongings, Maryland legislation mandates an equitable distribution, an idea that inherently acknowledges that an equal break up shouldn’t be at all times truthful or applicable.
-
Contribution Disparities
Spouses usually contribute unequally to a wedding, each financially and non-financially. One partner could be the first earnings earner whereas the opposite manages the family and raises youngsters. Maryland courts acknowledge these disparate contributions and modify property division accordingly. For instance, if one partner considerably enhanced the opposite’s incomes potential via help or training, this contribution warrants consideration, probably resulting in an unequal asset division. This acknowledgment undermines the notion of a easy 50/50 break up.
-
Financial Circumstances Submit-Divorce
The financial realities going through every partner after the divorce can affect asset distribution. One partner might have considerably diminished incomes capability because of age, well being, or lack of marketable expertise. In such circumstances, a courtroom would possibly award a bigger share of the marital belongings to the partner with diminished capability to make sure their future monetary stability. This deviation from an equal break up displays the courtroom’s dedication to attaining a simply and equitable end result slightly than adhering to a inflexible formulation.
-
Marital Misconduct and Dissipation of Property
Whereas Maryland is a no-fault divorce state, marital misconduct, particularly actions that led to the dissipation of marital belongings, can impression property division. If one partner squandered marital funds via playing or an affair, the courtroom might award the opposite partner a bigger share of the remaining belongings to compensate for the loss. This consideration of fault-related financial penalties demonstrates that property division shouldn’t be solely based mostly on a 50/50 calculation.
-
Period of Marriage
The size of the wedding is a related consider figuring out equitable distribution. In long-term marriages, courts usually try for a extra equal division of belongings, recognizing the intertwined nature of the spouses’ lives and contributions over time. Nevertheless, even in long-term marriages, extenuating circumstances can justify an unequal break up. Shorter marriages might even see a division that extra carefully displays every partner’s particular person contributions to the marital property, once more transferring away from a strictly equal division.
These aspects spotlight why Maryland shouldn’t be a 50/50 divorce state. The equitable distribution precept, with its consideration of particular person circumstances, contributions, and financial realities, ensures that asset division is tailor-made to realize equity slightly than adhering to a simplistic, probably unjust, equal break up.
3. Marital Property Outlined
The definition of marital property in Maryland straight influences whether or not the state might be precisely characterised as adhering to a 50/50 divorce precept. Maryland operates underneath equitable distribution, and solely belongings labeled as marital property are topic to this distribution. Marital property is usually outlined as any property acquired by both or each spouses in the course of the marriage, no matter whose identify is on the title. This excludes separate property, which incorporates belongings owned earlier than the wedding, inheritances obtained in the course of the marriage, or presents obtained from somebody apart from the partner in the course of the marriage. Due to this fact, the preliminary step in a Maryland divorce continuing is figuring out and categorizing belongings as both marital or separate, considerably shaping the eventual division.
Appropriately figuring out marital property is essential as a result of equitable distribution applies solely to this class of belongings. For example, if one partner owned a home previous to the wedding and continues to take care of it individually all through the wedding, that home usually stays their separate property and isn’t topic to division. Nevertheless, if marital funds have been used to pay down the mortgage or enhance the property, the rise in worth attributable to those marital contributions could also be thought-about marital property. This illustrates how the commingling of separate and marital belongings can complicate the willpower and subsequent distribution of property. Understanding this distinction shouldn’t be merely a authorized technicality however a sensible necessity that influences the monetary end result of the divorce.
In conclusion, the exact definition of marital property in Maryland basically impacts the asset division course of, precluding the applicability of a simplistic 50/50 rule. As a result of solely marital belongings are topic to equitable distribution, and since this distribution considers varied components past a easy equal break up, the characterization of belongings as marital or separate turns into a crucial determinant in divorce outcomes. Due to this fact, Maryland’s adherence to equitable distribution, guided by the exact definition of marital property, solidifies its distinction from a neighborhood property state with a simple 50/50 division mandate.
4. Non-marital Property
The existence and therapy of non-marital property straight contradict the notion that Maryland is a 50/50 divorce state. Non-marital property, outlined as belongings acquired earlier than the wedding, inheritances, or presents obtained individually in the course of the marriage (excluding presents from the opposite partner), shouldn’t be topic to equitable distribution. This exclusion basically alters the asset division course of, precluding a easy equal break up. For instance, if one partner inherits a considerable sum of cash in the course of the marriage and retains it separate from marital belongings, that inheritance stays their sole property and isn’t divided within the divorce. This authorized precept highlights that asset division in Maryland shouldn’t be solely a matter of dividing all belongings acquired in the course of the marriage equally, thus undermining the 50/50 assumption.
The correct identification of non-marital property is paramount. Failure to correctly classify an asset as non-marital can result in its inclusion within the marital property, probably leading to an unjust division. Think about a state of affairs the place a partner owned a enterprise previous to the wedding. If that enterprise maintains its separate id and no marital funds contribute to its progress, the enterprise stays non-marital property. Nevertheless, if marital funds are used to enhance the enterprise, or if the opposite partner actively participates in its operation, the courtroom might decide {that a} portion of the enterprise’s worth is marital property topic to distribution. This instance underscores the significance of tracing the origin and upkeep of belongings to make sure right classification and to guard legitimately held separate property throughout a divorce continuing.
In abstract, the idea of non-marital property is a crucial component in understanding Maryland’s equitable distribution system and why it deviates from a 50/50 mannequin. The authorized therapy of such property, its exclusion from the marital property, and the complexities surrounding its identification all contribute to a divorce course of that goals for equity slightly than strict equality. Recognizing the excellence between marital and non-marital property is important for people navigating divorce in Maryland, enabling them to guard their separate belongings and perceive the complexities of asset division throughout the state’s authorized framework.
5. Contribution Components
Contribution components play a pivotal function in figuring out property division in Maryland divorce circumstances, straight influencing whether or not the state operates as a 50/50 jurisdiction. Maryland’s equitable distribution legislation mandates equity, not essentially equality, making the contributions of every partner a central consideration in attaining a simply end result. Understanding these components is important to navigating the complexities of asset division throughout divorce proceedings.
-
Monetary Contributions
Monetary contributions embody the direct financial enter of every partner to the marital property. This consists of earnings earned, investments made, and belongings acquired in the course of the marriage. Disparities in earnings or monetary contributions don’t robotically lead to an unequal division, however they’re an element the courtroom considers. For instance, if one partner was the first breadwinner, contributing the vast majority of the earnings, this can be weighed towards the opposite partner’s non-financial contributions.
-
Non-Monetary Contributions
Non-financial contributions acknowledge the worth of efforts that don’t straight translate into financial features. This encompasses homemaking, childcare, and help for the opposite partner’s profession. Maryland courts acknowledge that these contributions are integral to the success of the wedding and warrant consideration in asset division. For example, a partner who sacrificed profession development to boost youngsters might obtain a higher share of the marital belongings to compensate for this contribution.
-
Contributions to Training or Profession
When one partner considerably contributes to the training or profession development of the opposite, it is a related consider property division. This contribution might contain monetary help for training, emotional help, or aiding with family tasks to permit the opposite partner to pursue profession alternatives. If, as an illustration, one partner supported the opposite via medical faculty, permitting them to change into a high-earning doctor, the courtroom might acknowledge this contribution by awarding a bigger share of the marital belongings.
-
Dissipation of Property
Whereas technically marital misconduct, actions that end result within the losing or squandering of marital belongings are additionally thought-about. If one partner engages in actions akin to playing, extreme spending, or an affair that depletes marital assets, the courtroom might modify the property division to compensate the opposite partner for the loss. This consideration straight deviates from a 50/50 break up, because it addresses the unfair discount of the marital property because of one partner’s actions.
The consideration of those assorted contribution components underscores that Maryland shouldn’t be a 50/50 divorce state. The equitable distribution precept, guided by an intensive evaluation of every partner’s contributions, ensures a good end result tailor-made to the distinctive circumstances of every marriage, transferring past a simplistic equal division of belongings.
6. Financial Circumstances
Financial circumstances are an important determinant in Maryland divorce proceedings, straight difficult the notion of a 50/50 asset division. Maryland legislation mandates equitable distribution, that means a good, not essentially equal, division of marital property. The financial realities of every partner, each throughout and after the wedding, considerably affect what constitutes a good division. For example, if one partner possesses considerably decrease incomes potential because of age, well being points, or lack of marketable expertise acquired in the course of the marriage, the courtroom might award a disproportionately bigger share of the marital belongings to that partner. This deviation from a strict 50/50 break up goals to mitigate the potential for financial hardship and guarantee a extra balanced end result post-divorce.
The courtroom considers a number of components when evaluating financial circumstances. These components embrace the present and future incomes capability of every partner, their entry to medical health insurance, retirement advantages, and different assets. For instance, a partner who primarily centered on homemaking and childcare all through a long-term marriage might have restricted employment alternatives post-divorce. In such a state of affairs, the courtroom is more likely to take into account awarding a bigger share of the marital belongings or alimony to offer that partner with the monetary help essential to change into self-sufficient. This isn’t about penalizing the higher-earning partner however slightly making certain that each events can preserve an inexpensive lifestyle following the dissolution of the wedding. Failure to contemplate these circumstances would lead to an inequitable end result, straight contradicting the ideas of Maryland’s equitable distribution legislation. Moreover, if one partner has substantial separate belongings, that is taken into consideration, probably impacting the division of marital property and altering any expectation of a 50/50 break up.
In abstract, the consideration of financial circumstances is a cornerstone of Maryland’s equitable distribution system, precluding a easy 50/50 asset division in divorce circumstances. This concentrate on equity and particular person wants ensures that divorce outcomes usually are not solely decided by a mathematical calculation however are tailor-made to handle the precise financial realities of each events. The sensible significance of this understanding lies in its capacity to stop undue financial hardship and promote a extra equitable transition for each spouses as they navigate life after divorce. The emphasis stays on attaining equity in gentle of the distinctive financial context of every case, slightly than adhering to a inflexible, probably unjust, equal division.
7. Fault Grounds relevance
The relevance of fault grounds in Maryland divorce proceedings considerably impacts the state’s adherence to a 50/50 asset division mannequin. Whereas Maryland is primarily a no-fault divorce state, that means a divorce might be granted with out proving wrongdoing, proof of fault can, in particular circumstances, affect property division, difficult any assumption of an equal break up.
-
Restricted Influence on Property Division
Maryland legislation typically prohibits the consideration of marital misconduct in figuring out the division of marital property. Nevertheless, there may be an exception: if one partner’s actions represent financial fault, that means they straight resulted within the dissipation or waste of marital belongings, this may be thought-about. For instance, if a partner gambled away a considerable portion of the couple’s financial savings, the courtroom might award a bigger share of the remaining belongings to the opposite partner to compensate for this loss. This restricted impression demonstrates that fault shouldn’t be a main driver of asset division however could be a issue when it straight impacts the marital property’s worth.
-
Financial Fault vs. Private Misconduct
It is essential to differentiate between financial fault and private misconduct. Private misconduct, akin to adultery or abandonment, doesn’t straight impression property division. Solely financial fault, which demonstrably diminishes the marital property, is related. For example, infidelity alone, with out related monetary penalties, is unlikely to affect asset allocation. This distinction reinforces that property division focuses on equity and financial outcomes slightly than punishing private failings.
-
Alimony Issues Influenced by Fault
Whereas fault grounds have a restricted function in property division, they might be extra related in figuring out alimony. If one partner’s actions prompted the breakdown of the wedding and resulted in financial hardship for the opposite partner, the courtroom might take into account this when awarding alimony. For instance, if a partner’s abusive conduct led to the opposite partner’s incapability to take care of employment, alimony could also be awarded to offer monetary help. The interaction between fault and alimony can not directly impression the general monetary end result of the divorce, even when property division shouldn’t be straight affected.
-
Burden of Proof
The partner alleging fault bears the burden of proving it. This requires presenting clear and convincing proof that the opposite partner’s actions prompted financial hurt to the marital property. Establishing financial fault might be difficult, requiring meticulous documentation and monetary evaluation. The problem in proving fault and the restricted circumstances underneath which it is thought-about additional underscore that Maryland shouldn’t be a 50/50 divorce state the place fault is a main driver of asset division.
In conclusion, whereas fault grounds have a restricted function in Maryland divorce proceedings, their potential impression on property division and alimony underscores that the state doesn’t adhere to a strict 50/50 mannequin. The main focus stays on attaining an equitable end result based mostly on the precise circumstances of every case, together with financial components and the potential for financial fault to have diminished the marital property. The interaction between fault, property division, and alimony contributes to a nuanced strategy that prioritizes equity over strict equality.
8. Alimony Issues
Alimony concerns are straight linked as to if Maryland might be characterised as a 50/50 divorce state. The potential for alimony considerably influences the division of marital property, transferring away from a strict equal break up. Alimony, often known as spousal help, is a court-ordered fee from one partner to the opposite, supposed to handle financial imbalances which will come up following a divorce. Its availability and quantity are decided by varied components, which in flip impression the general monetary settlement, together with property division. For example, if one partner is awarded alimony, this may occasionally scale back their want for a bigger share of marital belongings, thereby influencing the property division and precluding a easy 50/50 end result.
The components influencing alimony awards embrace the size of the wedding, the contributions of every partner (each monetary and non-financial), the financial circumstances of every partner, and the explanations for the divorce, together with marital fault which will have prompted financial hardship. Think about a state of affairs the place one partner sacrificed profession alternatives to help the opposite’s profession development and preserve the family for a few years. In such a case, the courtroom might award alimony to the sacrificing partner to compensate for his or her diminished incomes capability. This alimony award might then have an effect on the property division, with the supported partner receiving a smaller share of the marital belongings, demonstrating the interconnectedness of those monetary concerns. Moreover, the flexibility of the paying partner to fulfill their very own wants whereas offering alimony can be thought-about, making certain the alimony award is cheap and sustainable.
In conclusion, alimony concerns are integral to understanding why Maryland shouldn’t be a 50/50 divorce state. The potential for alimony, guided by varied components geared toward making certain financial equity, straight impacts the distribution of marital property. The interaction between alimony and property division ensures that the general monetary end result is tailor-made to the precise circumstances of every case, slightly than dictated by a inflexible, and probably unjust, equal division rule. This dedication to equitable outcomes, contemplating the broader financial realities of the divorcing events, solidifies Maryland’s adherence to equitable distribution slightly than a simplistic 50/50 mannequin.
9. Courtroom Discretion
Courtroom discretion in Maryland divorce proceedings straight determines whether or not the state operates as a 50/50 jurisdiction. Maryland legislation prescribes equitable distribution, not equal distribution, of marital property, granting judges appreciable latitude to tailor outcomes to the precise details of every case.
-
Flexibility in Making use of Components
Maryland statutes define components courts should take into account when dividing property, together with contributions of every partner, financial circumstances, and causes for divorce. Nevertheless, the load assigned to every issue, and the last word division of belongings, rests with the decide. This flexibility permits for nuanced selections reflecting the distinctive dynamics of every marriage. For instance, if one partner considerably diminished their incomes potential to care for youngsters, the courtroom might train its discretion to award a bigger share of marital belongings, a choice precluded by a strict 50/50 rule.
-
Deviation from Equal Division
The facility to deviate from an equal division of marital property is a key side of courtroom discretion. Even in circumstances the place contributions seem comparatively equal, different components can justify an unequal break up. For instance, if one partner is considerably youthful and more healthy, with higher incomes potential, the courtroom might award a bigger share of belongings to the older, much less wholesome partner. This capacity to deviate ensures equity by addressing disparate post-divorce financial realities, additional distancing Maryland from a 50/50 mannequin.
-
Addressing Distinctive Circumstances
Divorce circumstances usually current distinctive circumstances not explicitly addressed by statute. Courtroom discretion permits judges to contemplate these components when making property division selections. For example, if one partner has a incapacity requiring ongoing medical care, the courtroom might take into account this want when allocating belongings. This adaptability ensures that the result is simply and equitable, reflecting the truth {that a} standardized formulation can’t adequately handle the complexities of each divorce.
-
Restricted Appellate Assessment
Appellate courts typically defer to the trial courtroom’s train of discretion in property division issues, absent a transparent abuse of that discretion. This deference reinforces the trial courtroom’s authority to make fact-specific determinations. Until the trial courtroom’s resolution is demonstrably unreasonable or based mostly on an error of legislation, the appellate courtroom is unlikely to overturn it. This restricted appellate assessment underscores the importance of the trial courtroom’s discretionary energy in shaping divorce outcomes.
These aspects exhibit that courtroom discretion is a basic side of Maryland’s equitable distribution system, actively stopping the state from working as a 50/50 divorce jurisdiction. The pliability afforded to judges ensures that property division is tailor-made to realize equity based mostly on the precise circumstances of every case, slightly than adhering to a inflexible, probably unjust, equal break up.
Ceaselessly Requested Questions
The next questions and solutions handle widespread issues relating to property division in Maryland divorce proceedings, aiming to make clear misconceptions and supply a factual understanding of the authorized ideas concerned.
Query 1: Is Maryland a 50/50 divorce state?
No. Maryland operates underneath the precept of equitable distribution, that means marital property is split pretty, not essentially equally. Varied components are thought-about to make sure a simply end result for each events.
Query 2: What constitutes marital property in Maryland?
Marital property consists of belongings acquired by both or each spouses in the course of the marriage, no matter whose identify is on the title. This excludes separate property, akin to inheritances or presents obtained by one partner in the course of the marriage.
Query 3: What components do Maryland courts take into account when dividing property?
Maryland courts take into account varied components, together with the contributions of every partner (monetary and non-financial), the financial circumstances of every partner, the size of the wedding, the explanations for the divorce, and the worth of separate property owned by every partner.
Query 4: Does marital misconduct have an effect on property division in Maryland?
Usually, marital misconduct doesn’t straight have an effect on property division. Nevertheless, if one partner’s actions represent financial fault, ensuing within the dissipation or waste of marital belongings, the courtroom might take into account this when dividing property.
Query 5: How does alimony impression property division in Maryland?
Alimony, or spousal help, can not directly have an effect on property division. If one partner receives alimony, this may occasionally affect the willpower of a good distribution of marital belongings, probably resulting in an unequal property division.
Query 6: Can prenuptial agreements have an effect on property division in Maryland?
Sure, legitimate prenuptial agreements are typically enforceable in Maryland and might dictate how property is split within the occasion of divorce, overriding the default guidelines of equitable distribution.
In abstract, Maryland’s equitable distribution system goals to realize a good end result based mostly on particular person circumstances slightly than adhering to a strict 50/50 division of belongings. Understanding the authorized ideas governing property division is important for people navigating divorce proceedings in Maryland.
The following sections will delve into sensible methods for safeguarding belongings throughout divorce and discover assets obtainable to people present process this course of.
Navigating Property Division in Maryland
Understanding Maryland’s strategy to property division is essential for people going through divorce. The state adheres to equitable distribution, not a 50/50 break up, necessitating cautious planning and knowledgeable decision-making.
Tip 1: Doc Asset Acquisition: Keep thorough information of asset possession, together with dates of acquisition, sources of funds, and any related documentation. That is important for distinguishing between marital and non-marital property.
Tip 2: Hint Commingled Property: If separate property has been commingled with marital belongings, meticulously hint the origin and contributions of every to the commingled account or asset. This helps in establishing the non-marital part.
Tip 3: Assess Non-Monetary Contributions: Acknowledge and doc non-financial contributions to the wedding, akin to homemaking, childcare, or help for a partner’s profession. These contributions are related in figuring out an equitable distribution.
Tip 4: Consider Incomes Potential: Objectively assess present and future incomes potential. If one partner has considerably decrease incomes capability because of age, well being, or lack of marketable expertise, this must be factored into negotiations.
Tip 5: Think about Alimony Implications: Perceive the potential for alimony and the way it would possibly impression property division. A spousal help award might affect the necessity for a bigger share of marital belongings.
Tip 6: Have interaction a Certified Legal professional: Safe authorized counsel from an skilled Maryland divorce legal professional. An legal professional can present steerage on property classification, valuation, and negotiation methods.
Tip 7: Get hold of Skilled Valuations: For advanced belongings like companies, actual property, or retirement accounts, acquire skilled valuations from certified appraisers or monetary consultants. This ensures an correct evaluation of their value.
These concerns are paramount for navigating Maryland’s equitable distribution legal guidelines and defending one’s monetary pursuits throughout divorce. A proactive and knowledgeable strategy is essential for attaining a good end result.
The next concluding remarks will summarize the important thing takeaways from this dialogue and supply closing insights into navigating property division in Maryland divorce circumstances.
Conclusion
This exploration of whether or not Maryland is a 50 50 divorce state confirms it’s not. The state operates underneath equitable distribution, mandating equity, not essentially equality, in dividing marital property. This distinction requires contemplating a big selection of things, together with monetary and non-financial contributions, financial circumstances, and, in restricted circumstances, financial fault. The particular definition of marital versus non-marital property additional shapes the division course of, precluding a simplistic equal break up.
Understanding the nuances of Maryland’s equitable distribution legal guidelines is paramount for these navigating divorce. Information of asset classification, the components influencing property division, and the potential impression of alimony are essential for safeguarding monetary pursuits and attaining a simply end result. Searching for certified authorized counsel is important to navigate these complexities successfully and guarantee a good decision. The long-term monetary well-being of each events hinges on a complete understanding of those authorized ideas.
