The disposition of property held inside belief buildings throughout divorce proceedings is a fancy authorized query. The willpower of whether or not property held in belief are topic to division hinges on a number of elements, together with the kind of belief, its phrases, the timing of its creation, and the extent to which a divorcing get together workouts management over the belief property. For instance, a belief established lengthy earlier than the wedding, funded by household wealth, and managed independently could be handled in another way than a belief created through the marriage with marital property.
The importance of understanding how trusts are handled in divorce can’t be overstated. For people with substantial wealth, significantly those that have utilized trusts for property planning or asset safety functions, the potential inclusion of belief property in a divorce settlement can have vital monetary implications. Traditionally, the therapy of trusts in divorce instances has advanced, influenced by altering household buildings, evolving authorized interpretations of property rights, and rising sophistication in property planning methods. The equitable distribution legal guidelines of particular person states additionally play an important function in shaping outcomes.
A number of key facets warrant consideration when evaluating the potential impression of divorce on belief property. These embrace analyzing the precise language of the belief doc, figuring out whether or not the belief is revocable or irrevocable, assessing the beneficiary’s diploma of management over the belief, and tracing the supply of the funds used to ascertain or contribute to the belief. Understanding these parts is important for figuring out the vulnerability of belief property within the context of marital dissolution.
1. Belief Sort
The kind of trustmost notably, whether or not it’s revocable or irrevocabledirectly impacts its susceptibility to division throughout divorce proceedings. Revocable trusts, also called residing trusts, enable the grantor (the one who created the belief) to retain management over the property and modify or terminate the belief at any time. As a result of the grantor maintains such vital management, property held in a revocable belief are sometimes thought of a part of the marital property and due to this fact topic to division in a divorce. The rationale is that the grantors energy to entry or alter the belief successfully equates to possession, rendering the property accessible for equitable distribution.
Conversely, irrevocable trusts are typically extra shielded from division in divorce. As soon as established, the grantor usually can not alter or terminate the belief. The property are thus thought of to be outdoors of the grantor’s direct management. Nevertheless, even with irrevocable trusts, the diploma to which a divorcing partner is a beneficiary and the extent of their management or profit from the belief can nonetheless result in a portion of the belief property being thought of marital property. For instance, if a belief gives a partner with a assured annual earnings, a court docket may think about that earnings stream when figuring out spousal help or property division.
In abstract, whereas irrevocable trusts provide a better diploma of safety, no belief is completely immune from scrutiny in a divorce. Courts will study the precise phrases of the belief, the intent of the grantor, and the extent to which a divorcing partner advantages from or controls the belief property. Understanding the excellence between revocable and irrevocable trusts is due to this fact a basic step in assessing the potential impression of divorce on property held inside belief buildings. The safety afforded just isn’t absolute however moderately depending on a complete analysis of all related elements.
2. Belief Phrases
The precise stipulations outlined inside a belief doc profoundly affect whether or not belief property are shielded from division throughout divorce proceedings. These provisions dictate the beneficiaries’ rights, the trustee’s duties, and the general administration of the belief, thereby immediately impacting its vulnerability in a marital dissolution.
-
Spendthrift Clauses
A spendthrift clause prohibits beneficiaries from assigning or alienating their curiosity within the belief, successfully stopping collectors, together with a divorcing partner, from accessing these property. As an example, if a belief incorporates a spendthrift clause and a divorcing partner is a beneficiary, the court docket could be restricted in its skill to immediately award belief property. Nevertheless, the earnings derived from the belief should be thought of when figuring out spousal help obligations. The effectiveness of spendthrift clauses varies by jurisdiction and depends upon the precise wording of the clause and its software inside the related state’s legal guidelines.
-
Discretionary Trusts
Discretionary trusts grant the trustee broad authority to find out when and the way belief property are distributed to beneficiaries. If distributions are completely on the trustee’s discretion, a divorcing partner’s declare to belief property could also be weakened, as there isn’t a assured proper to obtain something. Nevertheless, courts could scrutinize the trustee’s actions, particularly if there may be proof that the trustee is performing in dangerous religion to deprive the divorcing partner of entry to funds they’d in any other case obtain. The diploma of discretion afforded to the trustee is a important consider assessing the trusts vulnerability.
-
Ascertainable Requirements
Trusts typically use ascertainable requirements, similar to “well being, training, upkeep, and help,” to information the trustee’s distribution selections. Whereas these requirements present some construction, they’ll nonetheless be topic to interpretation by the courts in divorce instances. For instance, if a belief directs the trustee to supply for a beneficiary’s “upkeep and help,” a court docket may think about the beneficiary’s accustomed way of life when figuring out what constitutes enough help. This could doubtlessly result in belief property being not directly thought of within the total divorce settlement.
-
Termination Provisions
The belief doc could embrace provisions that dictate when and the way the belief may be terminated. If the belief is scheduled to terminate quickly after the divorce, or if the divorcing partner has the ability to terminate the belief, the courts usually tend to think about the belief property as a part of the marital property. Conversely, if the belief has a protracted period and is designed to profit future generations, it could be seen as a extra distinct and separate entity, much less vulnerable to division within the divorce.
In the end, the exact language inside a belief doc is paramount in figuring out its therapy throughout a divorce. Whereas sure clauses and provisions can provide a level of safety, courts retain the ability to interpret the phrases of the belief in mild of the precise circumstances of the case. Subsequently, thorough authorized evaluation of the belief instrument is important to precisely assess its vulnerability inside the context of marital dissolution.
3. Creation Timing
The timing of a belief’s creation, relative to the wedding, is a important consider figuring out whether or not its property are topic to division in a divorce. Trusts established earlier than the wedding typically obtain extra safety than these created through the marriage, although the precise circumstances of every case significantly affect the end result.
-
Premarital Trusts
Trusts established previous to the wedding are sometimes thought of separate property, significantly if they’re funded with property acquired earlier than the wedding and should not commingled with marital funds. The authorized precept is that property owned earlier than the wedding usually stay the separate property of the proudly owning partner. Nevertheless, even premarital trusts can turn into topic to division if marital funds are later contributed to the belief or if the non-owning partner can show that their efforts through the marriage contributed to the belief’s appreciation. For instance, if a premarital belief owns a enterprise and the non-owning partner actively participates within the enterprise’s operations, a court docket may discover that the appreciation within the enterprise’s worth through the marriage is marital property topic to division.
-
Trusts Created Throughout Marriage with Separate Property
If a belief is created through the marriage however funded solely with separate property (similar to an inheritance acquired by one partner), the property inside the belief should be thought of separate property. The hot button is to keep up the separate identification of the funds and keep away from commingling them with marital property. If separate funds are blended with marital funds, your entire account may be deemed marital property. For instance, if a partner inherits cash and makes use of it to ascertain a belief solely for his or her profit, and retains the belief separate from marital funds, it is extra prone to be thought of separate property. Nevertheless, any earnings generated by the belief through the marriage could be handled as marital earnings.
-
Trusts Created Throughout Marriage with Marital Property
Trusts established through the marriage and funded with marital property are usually thought of marital property topic to division. It’s because property acquired through the marriage are typically thought of group property or topic to equitable distribution, relying on the state’s legal guidelines. Even when the belief is titled within the identify of just one partner, the supply of the funds dictates its characterization. As an example, if funds earned through the marriage are used to create a belief for the good thing about one partner, the belief is prone to be handled as marital property, and the court docket can order it to be divided or offset with different marital property.
-
Impression of Appreciation
No matter when a belief is created or the supply of its preliminary funding, the appreciation within the worth of the belief property through the marriage could also be thought of marital property in some jurisdictions. That is significantly true if the non-owning partner can show that their efforts contributed to the appreciation, both immediately or not directly. For instance, if a belief owns actual property that will increase in worth as a result of market circumstances, a court docket may think about the rise in worth through the marriage as marital property, even when the preliminary asset was separate property. The legal guidelines governing the therapy of appreciation fluctuate considerably by state, and knowledgeable authorized recommendation is essential in figuring out the potential impression on belief property.
In conclusion, the timing of a belief’s creation is a big however not definitive consider figuring out its therapy in a divorce. Whereas premarital trusts and trusts funded with separate property could obtain some safety, varied circumstances, similar to commingling, contribution to appreciation, and state legal guidelines, can impression their vulnerability. A radical authorized evaluation is important to establish the probably final result in any particular divorce case involving belief property.
4. Beneficiary Management
The diploma of management a beneficiary workouts over a belief is a big determinant of whether or not belief property are protected throughout divorce proceedings. This management, or lack thereof, immediately influences the extent to which a court docket will think about the belief property as a part of the marital property topic to division. Substantial management typically equates to possession within the eyes of the court docket, thereby diminishing the chance of the property being shielded from division. Conversely, restricted or no management enhances the prospects of the belief property remaining separate property, insulated from the marital dissolution.
A key consider assessing beneficiary management lies within the powers granted to the beneficiary inside the belief doc. If the beneficiary has the authority to nominate or take away trustees, the power to direct belief investments, or the ability to unilaterally withdraw funds, a court docket is extra inclined to view the belief property as being below the beneficiary’s efficient management. This could result in the belief property being thought of a part of the marital property, even when the belief was initially established with separate property. For instance, if a belief beneficiary can demand distributions at will, a court docket could order the beneficiary to make distributions to fulfill a divorce settlement. In distinction, if the belief is managed by an impartial trustee who has sole discretion over distributions, and the beneficiary has no energy to affect these selections, the belief property usually tend to be protected. Nevertheless, courts should think about the distributions the beneficiary receives from the belief when figuring out spousal help or alimony.
In abstract, the extent of a beneficiary’s management over a belief is a vital consideration in divorce instances. Substantial management can negate the protecting facets of a belief, making the property weak to division. Restricted or no management strengthens the argument that the belief property are separate property and shouldn’t be included within the marital property. The courts meticulously study the belief instrument and the beneficiary’s precise actions to find out the true stage of management, thereby shaping the end result of whether or not the belief property are topic to division or stay shielded from the dissolution of marriage.
5. State Legal guidelines
The authorized panorama governing the therapy of trusts in divorce proceedings is considerably influenced by state legal guidelines. These legal guidelines dictate property division guidelines, spousal help calculations, and the diploma to which belief property are thought of marital or separate property. Consequently, the query of whether or not belief property are exempt from division throughout a divorce is closely depending on the precise jurisdiction’s authorized framework.
-
Equitable Distribution vs. Neighborhood Property
States adhere to both equitable distribution or group property rules in divorce instances. In equitable distribution states, marital property is split pretty, although not essentially equally. Courts think about varied elements, such because the size of the wedding, the financial circumstances of every partner, and contributions to the wedding, when figuring out a good division. This broad discretion permits courts to look at belief property and decide if they need to be included within the marital property, even when technically separate property. Neighborhood property states, alternatively, typically divide marital property equally. In these states, property acquired through the marriage are usually thought of group property, no matter which partner holds title. Which means a belief created through the marriage with marital funds is prone to be divided equally between the spouses. The impression of those differing rules on belief asset division is substantial.
-
Definition of Marital and Separate Property
State legal guidelines outline what constitutes marital and separate property. Typically, marital property is outlined as property acquired through the marriage, whereas separate property contains property owned earlier than the wedding or acquired as a present or inheritance through the marriage. Nevertheless, the characterization of belief property may be complicated. Some states have adopted the “supply of funds” rule, which traces the origin of the property used to fund the belief. If a belief is funded with separate property, it could stay separate, even when created through the marriage. Different states give attention to the diploma of management a partner has over the belief property. Substantial management can result in the belief being thought of marital property, whatever the preliminary supply of funds. The precise definition of marital and separate property inside a state considerably impacts the therapy of belief property in divorce.
-
Discretionary vs. Necessary Distributions
State legal guidelines affect the therapy of belief distributions in divorce proceedings. If a belief mandates distributions to a partner, courts usually tend to think about these distributions as earnings accessible for spousal help. Even when the distributions are discretionary, courts could think about the partner’s potential to obtain distributions when figuring out spousal help obligations. Some states have particular statutes addressing the therapy of belief distributions in divorce, whereas others depend on case legislation and common rules of property division and help. The authorized precedent concerning belief distributions in a given state can significantly have an effect on the monetary final result of a divorce.
-
Spendthrift Provisions
The enforceability of spendthrift provisions, which purpose to guard belief property from collectors, together with divorcing spouses, varies by state. Some states strictly implement spendthrift provisions, stopping a divorcing partner from accessing belief property immediately. Nevertheless, even in these states, courts should think about the belief property not directly when figuring out spousal help or property division. Different states have exceptions to the enforceability of spendthrift provisions, similar to for spousal help or baby help obligations. The precise legal guidelines governing spendthrift provisions in a given state can considerably impression the diploma to which belief property are protected throughout a divorce.
In conclusion, state legal guidelines play a pivotal function in figuring out the destiny of belief property throughout divorce proceedings. The rules of equitable distribution versus group property, the definition of marital and separate property, the therapy of belief distributions, and the enforceability of spendthrift provisions all contribute to the complicated authorized evaluation required to evaluate the vulnerability of belief property within the context of marital dissolution. Attributable to this variability, it’s crucial to hunt authorized counsel inside the related jurisdiction to precisely assess the potential impression of state legal guidelines on the therapy of belief property throughout a divorce.
6. Intent of Grantor
The grantor’s intent in establishing a belief serves as a foundational component in figuring out whether or not belief property are shielded from division throughout divorce proceedings. Courts typically think about the grantor’s function in creating the belief, inspecting the belief doc itself and any associated proof to discern whether or not the belief was meant to profit the wedding or primarily to guard separate property. If the intent was clearly to profit just one partner and to protect property for that partner’s particular person profit, courts could also be much less inclined to incorporate the belief property within the marital property. Conversely, if the intent was to profit each spouses or if marital property had been used to fund the belief, the belief is extra prone to be thought of a marital asset topic to division. For instance, a belief established by a grandparent solely for the good thing about one grandchild (a divorcing partner), with no intention of benefiting the grandchild’s partner, stands a greater probability of remaining separate property.
Nevertheless, establishing the grantor’s intent may be difficult. Belief paperwork are sometimes drafted with common language, and the grantor could not be accessible to testify concerning their particular intentions. In such instances, courts depend on circumstantial proof, such because the timing of the belief’s creation, the supply of the property used to fund the belief, and the connection between the grantor and the beneficiaries. As an example, a belief created shortly earlier than a wedding, funded with property inherited by one partner, and with provisions limiting the opposite partner’s entry to the belief, suggests an intent to maintain the property separate. Equally, communication between the grantor and their lawyer through the creation of the belief can function proof of the grantor’s intentions, significantly if these intentions are explicitly said in written correspondence or assembly notes. The presence of a “no-contest” clause can even point out a robust intent to guard the belief from challenges, together with these arising from a divorce.
In the end, whereas the grantor’s intent is a big issue, it’s not the only determinant in deciding the destiny of belief property throughout a divorce. Courts stability the grantor’s intent with different related elements, similar to state legal guidelines, the phrases of the belief doc, and the diploma of management exercised by the beneficiary. Even when the grantor meant the belief to be separate property, a court docket should think about the belief property when figuring out spousal help or dividing marital property if it deems it obligatory to attain an equitable final result. Subsequently, though understanding the grantor’s intent is essential, it’s only one piece of the complicated puzzle in assessing the vulnerability of belief property in divorce proceedings. The power to successfully show that intent, by way of clear documentation and compelling proof, is important for safeguarding these property.
7. Commingling
Commingling, within the context of trusts and divorce, refers back to the act of blending separate property with marital property, doubtlessly jeopardizing the protected standing of belief property. If property initially designated as separate property inside a belief turn into indistinguishable from marital property as a result of commingling, your entire belief, or parts thereof, could also be topic to division throughout divorce proceedings. This precept stems from the authorized presumption that property acquired through the marriage is collectively owned, until clear and convincing proof proves in any other case. Subsequently, meticulous segregation of property is essential for sustaining the distinct identification of belief property.
The consequences of commingling may be noticed in varied situations. For instance, if a belief funded with a premarital inheritance generates earnings through the marriage, and that earnings is deposited right into a joint checking account used for household bills, the preliminary separate character of the belief earnings could also be misplaced. Equally, if marital funds are used to enhance or keep property held inside the belief, the appreciation in worth attributable to these enhancements might be thought of marital property. Actual property investments held in belief can also show this idea. For instance, if marital earnings is used to pay the mortgage on a property held inside a belief, that constitutes commingling and blurs the traces of exemptions of are trusts exempt from divorce.
In conclusion, understanding the implications of commingling is paramount for people searching for to guard belief property throughout divorce. Diligent record-keeping, separate accounts, and adherence to strict segregation of property are important methods for preserving the separate character of belief property. Failure to keep up this separation may end up in the unintended inclusion of belief property within the marital property, thereby undermining the grantor’s authentic intent and doubtlessly resulting in hostile monetary outcomes throughout divorce proceedings. The significance of searching for knowledgeable authorized counsel to make sure compliance with relevant state legal guidelines concerning commingling can’t be overstated.
8. Separate Property
The characterization of property as separate property is central to the query of whether or not trusts are exempt from division in divorce proceedings. Property deemed separate property, typically these owned earlier than the wedding or acquired as items or inheritance through the marriage, are sometimes afforded better safety from division than marital property. The extent to which belief property qualify as separate property immediately influences their vulnerability in a divorce settlement.
-
Supply of Funds Doctrine
The supply of funds doctrine traces the origins of property used to fund a belief. If a belief is established solely with separate property, similar to an inheritance acquired by one partner, the belief property could retain their separate character, even when the belief was created through the marriage. This precept is contingent upon sustaining the segregation of separate and marital funds and precisely documenting the supply of the belief property. Nevertheless, some jurisdictions could think about the rise in worth of separate property through the marriage as marital property, significantly if the non-owning partner contributed to its appreciation.
-
Commingling of Property
Commingling separate belief property with marital property can jeopardize their protected standing. If separate funds are blended with marital funds to such an extent that they turn into indistinguishable, a court docket could deem your entire commingled asset, together with the belief, as marital property topic to division. Subsequently, sustaining meticulous information and avoiding the blending of separate and marital funds is important for preserving the separate property character of belief property. The edge for commingling varies by jurisdiction, and even seemingly minor commingling can have vital penalties.
-
Premarital Agreements
Premarital agreements can explicitly tackle the therapy of belief property within the occasion of divorce. These agreements can specify that sure belief property will stay the separate property of 1 partner, no matter when the belief was created or the way it was funded. Nevertheless, the enforceability of premarital agreements depends upon assembly sure authorized necessities, similar to full disclosure of property and voluntary consent. Absent a legitimate premarital settlement, the default state legal guidelines concerning separate and marital property will govern the division of belief property.
-
Lively vs. Passive Appreciation
The excellence between lively and passive appreciation of separate property can impression the division of belief property. Lively appreciation refers to will increase in worth because of the efforts of 1 or each spouses through the marriage, whereas passive appreciation outcomes from market forces or different elements past their management. Some jurisdictions maintain that solely lively appreciation of separate property is topic to division, whereas passive appreciation stays separate. Subsequently, demonstrating that the rise in worth of belief property was primarily as a result of passive elements can strengthen the argument for his or her separate property standing.
The interaction between separate property and the willpower of whether or not trusts are exempt from division in divorce is complicated and extremely fact-specific. Whereas separate property typically receives better safety, varied elements, similar to commingling, lively appreciation, and the existence of premarital agreements, can impression its final disposition. A radical authorized evaluation, contemplating the precise circumstances of the case and the relevant state legal guidelines, is important for precisely assessing the vulnerability of belief property in a divorce continuing.
Regularly Requested Questions
The next questions tackle widespread issues concerning the therapy of belief property throughout divorce proceedings. These solutions present common data and shouldn’t be thought of authorized recommendation. Session with a certified lawyer is critical for particular steerage.
Query 1: Are trusts mechanically exempt from division in a divorce?
No, trusts should not mechanically exempt. The willpower hinges on varied elements, together with the kind of belief, its phrases, the timing of its creation, the supply of funds used to ascertain the belief, and the diploma of management the beneficiary workouts over the belief property.
Query 2: Does the timing of belief creation have an effect on its vulnerability in a divorce?
Sure, the timing is important. Trusts established earlier than the wedding are typically extra protected than these created through the marriage, significantly if funded with premarital property and stored separate from marital funds. Nevertheless, appreciation through the marriage could also be thought of.
Query 3: What function does the kind of belief (revocable vs. irrevocable) play?
Revocable trusts are typically thought of marital property as a result of the grantor retains management. Irrevocable trusts provide extra safety, however the diploma to which a divorcing partner is a beneficiary and the extent of their profit from the belief can nonetheless result in inclusion within the marital property.
Query 4: How do state legal guidelines affect the therapy of trusts in divorce?
State legal guidelines considerably impression the end result. States fluctuate of their strategy to equitable distribution versus group property, the definition of marital and separate property, and the enforceability of spendthrift provisions. These variations have an effect on how belief property are seen and divided.
Query 5: Can a prenuptial settlement defend belief property from division in a divorce?
Sure, a legitimate prenuptial settlement can explicitly tackle the therapy of belief property, specifying that sure belief property will stay the separate property of 1 partner. Nevertheless, enforceability depends upon assembly authorized necessities, similar to full disclosure and voluntary consent.
Query 6: What’s the impact of commingling belief property with marital property?
Commingling can jeopardize the separate property standing of belief property. If separate belief property turn into indistinguishable from marital property, a court docket could deem your entire asset, together with the belief, as marital property topic to division.
In abstract, figuring out the therapy of belief property in divorce requires a fancy authorized evaluation. Elements similar to belief sort, timing, beneficiary management, state legal guidelines, prenuptial agreements, and commingling all play a task in figuring out whether or not belief property are shielded from division.
Consulting with a certified authorized skilled is essential to evaluate the precise info of the case and navigate the related authorized complexities.
Defending Belief Property Throughout Divorce
The disposition of property held inside trusts throughout divorce proceedings requires cautious planning and execution. The next suggestions are offered to reinforce the chance of preserving belief property within the occasion of marital dissolution.
Tip 1: Set up Trusts Earlier than Marriage: Trusts created previous to the wedding are typically afforded better safety. Funding such trusts with premarital property and sustaining their separation from marital property can strengthen their designation as separate property.
Tip 2: Make the most of Irrevocable Trusts: Irrevocable trusts, the place the grantor relinquishes management, provide the next diploma of safety in comparison with revocable trusts. The phrases of the irrevocable belief ought to restrict beneficiary management and discretion to additional protect the property.
Tip 3: Incorporate Spendthrift Clauses: Spendthrift clauses limit a beneficiary’s skill to switch or assign their curiosity within the belief, defending property from collectors, together with divorcing spouses. The effectiveness of those clauses varies by jurisdiction and ought to be fastidiously drafted to adjust to native legal guidelines.
Tip 4: Preserve Meticulous Information: Correct and detailed information documenting the supply of funds used to ascertain and keep the belief are important. These information can function proof to help the declare that the belief property are separate property and haven’t been commingled with marital funds.
Tip 5: Keep away from Commingling Property: Strict segregation of belief property from marital property is paramount. Commingling can jeopardize the separate property standing of belief property, doubtlessly subjecting them to division throughout divorce proceedings.
Tip 6: Take into account a Premarital Settlement: A premarital settlement can explicitly outline the therapy of belief property within the occasion of divorce. The settlement ought to clearly state that the belief property are to stay the separate property of the beneficiary, no matter when the belief was created or the way it was funded.
Tip 7: Restrict Beneficiary Management: The diploma of management a beneficiary workouts over a belief is a big issue. Granting the beneficiary extreme management, similar to the ability to unilaterally withdraw funds or direct investments, can diminish the protecting facets of the belief.
Adhering to those tips can considerably improve the prospects of safeguarding belief property throughout divorce proceedings. Every scenario is exclusive, and authorized counsel ought to be sought to tailor these methods to the precise circumstances and relevant jurisdiction.
These suggestions present a strategic framework for managing belief property with divorce concerns in thoughts. The article’s conclusion gives a remaining abstract and emphasizes the significance {of professional} authorized steerage.
Conclusion
The previous evaluation underscores the multifaceted nature of figuring out whether or not belief property are shielded from division throughout divorce proceedings. Key concerns embrace the belief’s construction, the timing of its institution relative to the wedding, the grantor’s intent, the diploma of beneficiary management, and the relevant state legal guidelines. The interaction of those elements dictates the vulnerability of belief property within the occasion of marital dissolution. The assertion that trusts are mechanically exempt is demonstrably false; moderately, every case requires meticulous examination of its distinctive circumstances.
Given the complexities inherent on this space of legislation, proactive and knowledgeable planning is important. People using trusts for property planning or asset safety ought to seek the advice of with certified authorized counsel to evaluate the potential impression of divorce on their belief buildings. Understanding the relevant authorized framework and implementing applicable methods are paramount for preserving wealth and making certain that the meant beneficiaries in the end obtain the good thing about the belief property. The long-term safety of those property warrants cautious and continued consideration.
